Are the writers at NRO going to have to put up their own stop the smears site? CNN did a edit job on the interview that they aired of Stanley Kurtz. They are misquoting and lying about the facts.
This is the same thing they did at ABC and CBS to the Palin interviews. Here is what Stanley had to say about CNN and the NYT who did a whitewash piece on Obama and Ayers yesterday.
CNN/NYT Bias Contest
A CNN article on Sarah Palin’s criticism of Barack Obama’s relationship to unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers actually cites National Review as one of the publications supposedly debunking Palin’s point. How CNN can cite National Review this way is a mystery to me. Maybe we’ll have to set up an NR "truth squad."
I was very briefly on CNN immediately after the McCain campaign called for me to be given access to UIC library. A CNN reporter interviewed me, and almost every question was an attempt to challenge the significance of the Obama-Ayers link. I answered every query in detail. When the report finally aired, my points about the significance of the Obama-Ayers connection were cut. And now, CNN is actually claiming NR as an ally in its effort to undercut Palin. Incredible.
CNN has now apparently changed it’s faulty article and substituted The New Republic for National Review in the list of publications supposedly debunking the notion of an Obama-Ayers relationship. That doesn’t solve the problem but only highlights it. To report fairly, shouldn't’t CNN also note that National Review has offered evidence establishing a significant working relationship between Obama and Ayers?
I have been told by a person in the military that CNN became one of the most watched networks during Desert Storm. What a lot of people don't realize is they were there because they could not get out. Yes they missed the plane so to say. They didn't listen when told to get out and got trapped there. That is when they started getting a lot of viewers because of the coverage of Desert Storm. I have noticed that Fox News has gained in the numbers during the last few months of this election. During the Palin/Biden debate Fox had 11,098,000 while CNN was close behind with 10,685,000. Why is that? Because people are learning they can't trust CNN to tell the truth. CNN has the truth but chooses to not tell it to the people just as the NYT does.
If you missed the NYT piece of fiction Stanley wrote about it yesterday.
NYT's Ayers-Obama Whitewash
Steve Diamond wrote about it also and Stanley links to him and others. Don't be fooled people. We know the MSM will lie about Obama and try to take down anyone who gets in the way of an Obama presidency. They have been doing it throughout the whole campaign. Here are some things to note.
Shane mentions Obama's endorsement of the book, yet says nothing about the book’s actual content.
Shane does not mention the boxes of papers from the Annenberg foundation or that Kurtz had to fight to get a look at them.
And what I find very revealing in the Kurtz piece.
Most remarkably of all, Shane seems to paper over the results of his own questioning. On the one hand, toward the end of the piece we read: "Since 2002, there is little public evidence of their relationship." And it’s no wonder, says Shane, since Ayers was caught expressing no regret for his own past terrorism in an article published on September 11, 2001. Yet earlier in Shane’s article we learn that, according to Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt, Obama and Ayers "have not spoken by phone or exchanged e-mail messages since Mr. Obama began serving in the United States Senate in January 2005." Very interesting. Obama’s own spokesman has just left open the possibility that there has indeed been phone and e-mail contact between the two men between 2002 and 2004, well after Ayers’ infamous conduct on 9/11. Yet instead of pursuing this opening, Shane ignores the findings of his own investigation and covers for Obama.
It was not debunked as the Obama campaign says it was it was proven that they had a close working relationship and while the NYT piece admits Obama lied about their relationship they go on to cover up for him.
If people would just look at the so called friends and mentors in Obama's life and see what they have said about America and Americans. These are the people Obama chose to surround himself with.
William Ayers, Reverend Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Father Pfleger, Tony Rezko,
Think about what all these people have in common and ask why Obama chose these people to be his mentors, religious leaders, friends. Obama says we are "Typical White People" We cling to our guns and religion and have antipathy towards people who don't look like ourselves, (bigots/racist) and what has Obama said about our troops?
Obama: troops just airraiding villages and killing civilians
That really helps the world view of America...dumb, just dumb.
CNN is still not telling the truth on Obama and Ayers. Reliable sources is doing their best to cover it up. Not so reliable anymore are they?
Palin will be in two places today.Sarah Palin attends a fundraiser in Burlingame, California at 1:50PM. and at 8:00PM. Sarah Palin attends a “Road to Victory” rally in Omaha, Nebraska.
Here is a bit of proof of the bias. H/T to Matthew Archblod.
Hilarious Example of Media Bias
How much more proof do people need?

1 comments:
October 5, 2008 at 12:46 PM
Character does matter: If you believe Obama sat in a church for 20 years and didn't hear Rev. Wrights hate speach, that he sat at the feet of Frank Marshal Davis(google), Or that his associations with Ayers, The New Party(google), Resko, ACORN and other shady characters has not influenced Obama's charater and judgement, then you must also believe, though having never seem me, that i am the most handsome, sexiest man alive.
Post a Comment